ATP Flight School Expands Training Fleet With 61 New Aircraft

ATP Flight School announced it is expanding its training fleet with the addition of 61 new aircraft in 2025, according to a press release on Tuesday.


This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://www.avweb.com/aviation-news/atp-flight-school-expands-fleet-with-61-new-aircraft

“New” in combination with a Cessna 172 or Piper Seminole sure sounds like an oxymoron. Do these aircraft include a BRS parachute recovery system or air conditioning, two items that ought to be standard on a “new” aircraft in 2025?

1 Like

A 172 with AC and a BRS added will be one heavy 172! Might as well remove the rear seats.

  • is BRS a factory option or do you have to get it added after purchase?
  • Is there even such a thing as AC? I have never seen a 172 with it ever, it seems to be more a Piper thing.
1 Like

Just wait until the pilots that get training on the G1000, are faced with an old 6 pack system. They won’t know what hit them.

I suspect it’s easier to go from a 6 pack to the G1000, instead of the other way around.

I got my Commercial in a C172 fifty nine years ago. And here they are still doing their good work as an all around excellent flying machine. True, a bit more expensive now.

Pet peeve of mine: We have got to the point where you are almost getting a type rating for a plane+avionics combo. When I got my IFR it was all 6-pack from C-152s to 737s, there was no problem jumping in a plane you had never flown before.
Now a Garmin 1000 trained pilot might have one hell of a time with a Dynon Skyview setup even in the exact same airplane, let alone flying on steam gauges.

Interesting timing for this article. Just yesterday I saw a new looking 172 with the ATP logo on the tail, taxi by my hangar at KSGR (near Houston). I also noticed the ATP logon on the side of a big hangar that was built by an acquaintance last summer. I wonder if KSGR, which already has an established flight school, is one of their new expansion sites. Considering the cost of all this shiny new hardware, I wonder what the hourly cost of operation will be.

You are absolutely correct. When I was at what was Avantair, pilots who trained in the Piaggio II with the pro-line 21 avionics had much more difficulty transitioning back to the Piaggio I with the older system that mimicked steam gauges. Pilots such as myself who learned with steam gauges had a much easier time transitioning to “glass” cockpit in the Piaggio II.

This topic was automatically closed after 7 days. New replies are no longer allowed.