Originally published at: FAA Faces Staffing Crisis Amid Wave Of Departures - AVweb
More than 1,200 employees—including senior leaders and technical experts—are leaving, raising concerns about the agency’s ability to maintain key safety and regulatory functions.
1 Like
“…some inspectors are weighing whether to resign, citing dissatisfaction with return-to-office mandates.”
Poor babies, they have to get out of their pajamas and go to work. Go ahead quit, you will show us!
3 Likes
This reads like a press release from a labor union. OMG people have to show up to work again! How unreasonable! Cutting the staffing in bloated back office staff positions to be able to increase staffing in front line air traffic controllers, engineers and inspectors… how unreasonable. The notion that there isn’t a lot of waste and bloat in the lethargic FAA is nuts.
3 Likes
And BTW, how do these critical “inspectors” inspect anything from their sofa?
I’m sick of politics. The only ‘spinning’ that makes any sense is at a safe altitude and in an aircraft approved for such.
1 Like
Hmm - 3%. That means it will take about 33 years for the entire staff to turn over. Sounds like business as usual to me.
1 Like
Politics have no place in this forum.
From Russ:
I disagree but name calling and baseless “fact” distribution do not.
3 Likes
A 3% cut in non-ATC administrative positions is a crisis? Give me a break.
Private companies routinely do this at much larger numbers and I feel certain they are starting from a higher efficiency/effectiveness base.
3 Likes
This whole forum exists primarily for these beatings and peoples inability to stop commenting.
I don’t work for the FAA, but you need to expand your thinking. For people that work “from home” doesn’t always mean what you picture it as. In many cases, an employee (ie : Inspector) goes to an alternate work location. So if an employee were to go "to the office " but then have to turn around and drive 100 miles in the opposite direction, would that be more efficient? So Inspectors go to manufacturing sites, or maybe check out a part 135 operation at an airport, not something that can be done from a desk. I worked with many FAA guys, and they were conscientious in their duties and decent people. And I know from experience that sometimes FBO’s or manufacturing sites will try to cheat and game the system.
3 Likes
I DO work for the FAA, as an Inspector. We have been, collectively, holding our breath since the Duncan/Gilligan “culture change”, waiting for the “big smoking hole”.
You don’t quit your job, you quit your management and ever since 2015 and before the experience level and aggregate technical knowledge of the inspector workforce has been dwindling as people get sick and tired of the Lieutenant Syndrome mentality seeping into the management group. We have so few managers who’ve actually done what they’re trying to manage it’s absolutely pathetic. Duncan did away with the Leads and Supervisors leaving the managers to try and run things. In their frustration more and more managers are bailing.
Now we’ve reached a point where if we ever had to return to the technically savvy workforce that once existed, pre-2010, we no longer have the Inspectors with the experience in what they’re inspecting to teach the newbies that now occupy the cubicles in the offices.
Covid taught us that we can get along just fine with Zoom and Teams and when we need to collaborate all it takes is a quick mouse click and you have the answers you need. Our job is on the ramp and in the hangars of the world. Not in some office just for the sake of having the workforce in an office.
The absolute worst reason to standardize is for the sake of standardization. The claim of returning the workforce to the office so they may collaborate is patent nonsense. It’s simply about control. Now they’re looking for places to house us in non Flight Standards facilities. Collaboration???
I call Bull shirt on this one. It’s all about control and dominance. Nothing else.
The Return To Office mandate is simply the last straw for entirely too many experienced Inspectors.
I’m checking my hold card and will be taking my 55+ years with me when I go back to teaching or whatever, (Maybe Wal Mart Greeting). Fact is I’m not done yet but I’ll be damned if I’ll be part of an organization that causes the next “smoking hole”.
4 Likes
I really wonder how many bright college or trade school graduates want to take a job with the FAA or any other branch of government, if they have any other options.
2 Likes
These people are not leaving because of politics. They were leaving anyway, they probably took other jobs elsewhere, and yes a few that qualify for retirement might have decided to leave. But the fact of the FAA is that it’s an antiquated agency that hasn’t updated its system since the wright brothers, and it’s catching up to them. Most of the FAA administrative function can and should be automated, but unfortunately for anything to get done requires months and years of planning and by the time they put in place it’s already old.
1 Like
What part of their job requires going to an office?
2 Likes
None of it requires going to an office if they are an inspector.
2 Likes
During COVID, FAA inspectors were some of the few still doing their jobs. My local FSDO leases it’s building for $20,000 per month plus additional infrastructure costs such phone lines, electricity, water, internet, emergency equipment…etc. Except for airman certifications, an ASI’s work is done almost solely in the field. And even those aforementioned certifications can and were completed in the field during COVID. The only reason for a brick and mortar location is to complete administrative work and to socialize. And even admin work can be done anywhere because the government has given those ASIs the tools to do it anywhere. So you tell me where the tax dollar waste is. Is it the previous telework policy where the employee paid out of pocket for their operating costs or is it the $20k+ per month of tax dollars for nonvalue added expense?
The FAA does not drive safety. They regulate the number of businesses that are certificated. Most FAA are retired military and have no business being in civilian aviation. I would require that no retired military be hired into the FAA. All hires are to be taken from the industry with at least 10 years experience.
Sounds like you are venting more than giving a fair take. If you are frustrated with the FAA, fine, but going after everyone with a military background is off base.
A lot of veterans bring solid experience. These are people who flew or worked on complicated aircraft, handled tough situations, and followed safety rules to the letter. That kind of know-how does not just fade when they take off the uniform.
Raf
1 Like
Here is an example of what I am talking about. I hired a retired air force mechanic to work on small general aviation aircraft. He could not troubleshoot simple 12 volt systems. He was lacking in other areas too. And guess what, the FAA hired him because he gets more points for being a retired veteren than someone not with veteran status. The guy should not be anywhere near any type of aviation. Here’s another one of many that I have experienced. I maintained a fleet flight school aircraft. The FAA showed up and I happened to be on the flight line. This guy was retired Navy. He grounded the aircraft because the tires were not round. I am kidding you not and this same idiot asked me where the flight instruments were. I asked him if he was kidding but he was serious. Hard to believe, huh? The FAA is a joke. Manned with a bunch of idiots. Yes there are some good people buy they are few and far between.