Controller On Leave After Reagan Tower Fisticuffs

The FAA has confirmed that one employee at the Washington Reagan Airport tower is no longer working while it investigates an incident in the cab last Thursday. "The employee is on administrative leave while we investigate the matter," the agency said in an email statement to AVweb Monday after rumors swirled about a violent fist fight between two controllers. The Daily Mail first reported the altercation and said the fight ended with blood being splashed on a console in the tower. It's believed the controllers were on duty at the time but the FAA declined to confirm that and did not elaborate on its single-sentence statement.


This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://www.avweb.com/aviation-news/controller-on-leave-after-reagan-tower-fisticuffs

Totally understandable that tensions and emotions will be high. What happened in DCA would be traumatic for any reasonable human to experience. I’m sure with the added frustration of knowing how the event could have been avoided, frustration, anger, and other powerful emotions are ever-present. I sincerely hope that the team there can move forward in a constructive way.

1 Like

IF it turns out that the FAA left the controllers who were on duty that night in place … that’s unconscionable. They should have been reassigned to lighter duties and given some mental health care, as well.

I came across a 15 minute video yesterday entitled, “Why the US Doesn’t Have Enough Controllers.” In it, they say that manning is about 75% and forced overtime is taking its toll on controllers. It didn’t paint a pretty picture of the current situation or the amount of time and effort required to find, cull, train and qualify new controllers. It also outlines the dismal state of the equipment they’re using. Given the amount of money being spent, this is also unconscionable. While I don’t support privatization, it sure seems like ‘our’ FAA has fallen on its sword. Only a fly on the wall knows what happened here but it’s surely the canary in the coalmine.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/news/why-the-u-s-doesn-t-have-enough-air-traffic-controllers/vi-AA1BTyzR?

The wheels are coming off… DCA has been a clownshow for a while now - that isn’t new. When there is no accountability for screw-ups, no culture of professionalism, no ATC version of the 6 month checkrides that 135/121 pilots get… It is only going to get worse and DCA is but one facility.

Well, according to the local news here in DC, the controller on leave is now charged with assault:

"support the mental health of controllers who “had to sit and watch bodies being pulled out of the river.”

Excuse me, but I think that controllers SHOULD have to watch the consequences of what happens if you fail to positively control aircraft at your airport.

Spot on. Actions have consequences. Lack of action also.

Let the wheels come off… you reap what you sow…

If I’m not mistaken there was only a single tower controller involved in the incident, yet you think all the controllers who work in that tower should be required to view the dead bodies of the victims? Seems a bit morbid to me.

“yet you think all the controllers who work in that tower should be required to view the dead bodies”

Of course the controllers should view the consequences…
What makes controllers any different from first responders, recovery crews, or even the general public who have a view of the crash site from their offices? It’s causing a hell of a lot more mental anguish for the public and for the families of the victims so controllers should man up and maybe learn from it.

This thread has totally missed the point. The HR people that crafted the DEI policy at FAA should have been made to retrieve the bodies personally. Remember our President said that was the cause of the accident before the first responders arrived on the scene.

“Man up?” C’mon. Do I really have to explain the difference between air traffic controllers and first responders? Your comparison with “the general public” who might have a view of a recovery site is specious. They have a choice whether to look or not. You are proposing a MANDATE that controllers must view victims’ remains.

Suggesting anyone has to view dead bodies to “man up” is macabre. I don’t need to see dead bodies to imagine the consequences of mistakes in the cockpit. I’m sure air traffic controllers can imagine tragedy as well as me.

3 Likes

I can’t imagine what the controllers who were in the tower that night have gone through. Instead of “punishing” the controllers, what should be mandatory is having all members of Congress watch the recovery efforts in person as a reminder of their continued actions allowing more and more flights out of DCA, way in excess of airport capacity. Interesting that the NTSB chairperson has not pointed that out in her testimony in Congress, instead conveniently blaming the FAA. Imagine the outcry if a general aviation airplane had been involved!

3 Likes

Sounds like they want to scapegoat the Controller. Incredibly unfair.
The low hours chopper pilot should not have been training near the approach path of a passenger aircraft. What else could the Controller do when PAT stated they had the airliner in sight?
Practice night vision away from controlled airspace. Military or not.

2 Likes

If there aren’t enough controllers to handle the current workload, then why aren’t the number of flights being reduced accordingly? Would that not be a solution to the problem? Would it be a huge inconvenience/problem for people who need/want to travel? Of course it would, but if it means safer air travel, then I think that’s what needs to happen. Expecting a greatly reduced workforce to continue to keep up with a workload that isn’t reduced accordingly is unreasonable and obviously dangerous in this industry! Same goes for pilots and aircraft buliders/maintenance staff too!

3 Likes

This topic was automatically closed after 7 days. New replies are no longer allowed.