system
I will be interested to hear Paul B’s analysis of how well the new and improved website works.
I will be interested to hear Paul B’s analysis of how well the new and improved website works.
Well - I will give it this. The accident database (lets face it - the only thing most of us are interested in!) now appears to be searchable in simple human terms and not with an arcane understanding of how the system MIGHT have filed what you are looking for. Every accident I could think of came right up (as long as you are searching post 1983)
I hope this will replace the CAROL system which, for example, required nine steps to search the NTSB data base for accidents concerning an aircraft type and range of dates of accidents. I used to spend time looking at the accident data base which listed accidents by date, starting with the most recent. The capability to access that data base mysteriously evaporated several years ago (with the advent of CAROL?). Later today, I’ll attempt to access the accident data base, hoping that the procedure is now more straight forward.
The NTSB says it plans to “keep enhancing the site iteratively.” This quote from the above article does not fill me with optimism. I even looked up the definition of “iteratively”, but am still not clear on what that sentence means.
1 reply
“Iteratively” is a term of art in software development, and tech industries more generally (my field). It means to repeat a cycle of: publish (release) a product or site, evaluate it, make a few improvements in a short time, and publish again; frequently, many times. In other words, to “iterate” through the cycle. This is in contrast to accumulating lots of changes into one big update, which takes a long time to appear.
1 reply
Thanks for that clarification. I’ve done a little bit of looking around the internet and think that I now understand the concept of “enhancing iteratively”. Is it officially known as the Iterative Process? Anyway, I like the concept and think that it should have driven the development of such programs as the F-35, KC-46 etc.
I have to agree with Rick at Aviation Consumer, the new site is basic at best. My take is redesigned by tech and not by people that actually use the site for research. If this is what the NTSB wanted, then they are proponents of the cancel culture, only letting us see what THEY want us to see. I am not happy with the new “cute” site at all. Perfect for a ten year old tho.