As someone (outside the US) who learned to fly in the second half (just) of the 20th Century and who worked as an ATC for 30 years, I have been reading accident reports for a LONG time.
I think it is your job in this venue to winnow the wheat from the chaff. If any of your readers is an ‘ambulance chaser’ and you don’t report it, they will find the reports elsewhere.
Did I mention that I also worked in freelance aviation journalism? To sell a story you write for the specific readership of the magazine you pitch it to; you must know that.
Assuming that, you know your readership. YOU look at the story and decide what the lesson is in the specific accident and decide whether it is of value to your readership and publish or not. It’s that simple - in my opinion.
In my own case I learned long before the term CFIT became popular that the biggest killer in VFR GA was the pressure to complete the flight in its many names - ‘press on-itus’, "get home-itus’, “I’ll just go a bit further and have a look” etc.
I briefed VFR pilots on enroute weather but they always wanted to “have a look”. Some died. I finally stopped detail briefing and said simply, “The forecast is Non-VMC; don’t go.” Some went anyway.
The first time I struck weather I did not like the look of (in a VFR-only-equipped C-152 on the return from a weekend trip away with another VFR pilot) I did a 180 and landed at an airfield in the clear, called the Tower where I was rostered that evening and suggested they find a replacement. The aircraft sat there for some weeks as the WX persisted. I came home by train.
This is just one of the things I learned from reading accident reports and one of the reasons I am still here at 74; there are plenty of reasons why I shouldn’t be, outside of flying, including a year in Vietnam. Bob.