I don’t disagree one bit. Factual information is key. And so are false impressions created by hyper drive titles. Basically, there were no relevant facts in the article beyond the screaming headline and mention in the article that the accident aircraft was a Turbo Beaver. Then the author of the hints darkly that “there may have experienced a problem with the takeoff”. Now THAT’s useful speculation considering that the aircraft crashed on takeoff. I wish the Sweden accident was THE only accident in the world. Slow news days, I guess. A brief look at the ASIAS (FAA Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing) system for the two week period from 28 Jun through 12 Jul shows that US pilots experienced 15 fatal accidents and over 150 non-fatal accidents. Even a little bit of mining would uncover many with preliminary information of value. A few more minutes of googling the fatal accidents would likely turn up multiple news reports with some factual information easily verified. Just shouting out a sky diving accident occurred without offering the key information that it was in Sweden, there likely won’t be any information published by the NTSB because the aircraft was foreign is sort of like shouting “fire” in a theatre in Los Angeles, when the ‘fire’ is actually in a theatre in San Paulo, Brazil. Hate to disappoint you, no mia culpa here. I stand by the original comment.