Agreed. And “The absence of a fatality or an accident does not mean the presence of safety.” I must have missed something. It kinda does, at least to my 20th century head. I think what she meant was that “…does not mean the absence of danger.” (I am reminded of the traffic safety sign person who told me I couldn’t drive in the lane in which her eyes could clearly see I was driving.) Maybe that’s just semantics but when we use language to communicate semantics are important, plus that sort of statement makes it seem that someone would rather say something that sounds good than actually say something that triggers improvement. Can we really afford that mentality in aviation?