As an outsider (PPL), it seems half the issue is the fuel, the other half is the (mis)information being spread. The interests are big enough for the various players to bend the arguments one way or any other, often in good faith, but not always. Reminds me of all the things in life I want to avoid getting into. The very little I do know : 1. GAMIjectors are very much proven by the results in hard data (spread graphs). 2. Pelican Perch John Deakin was involved w GAMI and Advanced Pilot Seminars. Didn’t get to meet him personally but still : I don’t think he would have stood for any BS, so another point for GAMI. 3 FAA blanket STC approval, another point for GAMI. Haters better come with strong arguments, and with aliases who knows what interests the haters have.
I’m sorta w Russ : I hope someone breaks the deadlock, a black swan so to speak, and just says enough BS this is our solution we go for it now.
One more thing Russ, 1 more GAMI input line needs to be boldfaced "GAMI has never claimed it is “perfect.” … ". Thank you AVWEB for trying to untangle this mess.
2 Likes