"The Lindbergh Foundation is committed to my Grandparents vision of balance between advancing technology and preservation of the environment using science and data – not political ideology. " Yet this program appears to be dedicated to YOUR ideology–and anyone that disagrees is mocked as a “dinosaur.”
"I hear loud and clear that this program is a big threat you each of you somehow, but fail to understand through your rhetoric why it is such a threat. Cost? Liberal conspiracy? Climate denial skepticism? I said publicly at the newsmakers luncheon that I believe that aviation has a target on its back, earned or unearned, but regardless, aviation needs to create solutions and drive from the left seat-- "
You have a “solution” to a “problem” that many people do not believe exists–yet you would insist that everyone bends to YOUR PERCEIVED PROBLEM AND “CURE”–and those “cures” may be fatal to the patient.
In case you haven’t read the replies–there are MANY that don’t believe that carbon emissions are a problem–but like those people, you are entitled to your belief–just don’t try to get government to enforce your belief.
Far too many “true believers” believe that they have the solution to this problem that may or may not exist–but there are an equal number of people that believe that your “cure” may be for a “disease” that may or may not exist–or even WORSE than the perceived problem.
The science isn’t “settled”–far from it–but please don’t get government involved to enforce a perceived theory, where the “cure” (mining, electric propulsion, a strain on the transmission lines, unproven propulsion (hydrogen), operational dangers, and battery disposal…) is worse than a perceived problem.