Mikko, please enlighten me to the evidence showing that “climate change is the main reason for the variation in carbon dioxide levels and not the other way around.” It seems that the ice core, sediment core, tree ring, peat bog and just about any other paleoclimate data set would disagree with your statement. I could be wrong, or maybe I just misunderstand what enlightened means, but if you’re using the classical definition, then I need to be enlightened as to how the past century of research is wrong.
I’m also curious about the basic arithmetic and physics skills you speak of, I’m guessing you mean current engineering challenges. If not, please enlighten me of these as well. Thanks.