On the surface it looks like a classic conservative move, ostensibly putting bureaucracy in its place and giving business the ability to challenge government when it gets in the way. But critics of the Supreme Court's decision last Friday to quash the so-called Chevron Deference say the move will create a logjam that will bog down needed regulations in a society where AI-fueled tech is changing the way we live at breakneck speed.
The Supreme Court has one purpose, to affirm or deny a law or action brought forth, to the compliance and adherence to the US Constitution. It would do the public and thus our nation a service to know our US Constitution. That is, to know it the way it was written, why it was written and how it was written and intended. No where was an “interpretation” intended. The founders should have created a pass-fail test requirement in the US Constitution though, to be taken by citizens before voting in each election and before running for office. That would prevent most all of our issues past, present and future. I suppose they had no idea people could become so stupid.
On the contrary, I believe the founders DID intend interpretation as the need arose. The Constitution, and in particular, the first ten amendments, were written in somewhat of a hurry and the high level wording allows for much ambiguity and uncertainty when applied to real life scenarios. From freedom of speech and the bearing of arms to pleading the fifth, all have required interpretation as to what the founders really meant or would have intended in a particular scenario.