…then by definition it is not a drop in replacement
By what/whose definition? I’m not trying to be pedantic here, but it seems that a lack of a clear definition is what the court cases are about in the first place.
…then by definition it is not a drop in replacement
By what/whose definition? I’m not trying to be pedantic here, but it seems that a lack of a clear definition is what the court cases are about in the first place.