Assuming your comment is in good faith and as an education opportunity to others:
a) DOGE is part of the executive. Legislative updates should be handled through the legislature (unless executive rulemaking is your cup of tea), which is what PMHC is advocating for.
b) Hormonal IUDs are necessary for medical treatment of endometriosis, which affects 10% of women worldwide. My wife will likely need a hormonal IUD for the foreseeable future because of this. Don’t assume IUDs are purely for contraception, since like you say it’s such a personal matter.
c) 14 CFR 61.53 reads: Operations that do not require a medical certificate. For operations provided for in § 61.23(b) of this part, a person shall not act as pilot in command, or in any other capacity as a required pilot flight crewmember, while that person knows or has reason to know of any medical condition that would make the person unable to operate the aircraft in a safe manner.
Unclear if that applies at all to 103 but I would assume the FAA could claim a letter saying you’re not fit to fly could be construed as having “reason to know of any medical condition that would make the person unable to operate the aircraft in a safe manner” (PPL / Revoked Medical For OWI / Can I fly gliders/Part 103 in the meantime? | Pilots of America).
d) If you used the airmen inquiry tool https://amsrvs.registry.faa.gov/airmeninquiry/Main.aspx you would know Xyla Foxlin is not a pseudonym.