It’s a very early King Air, a 65-A90 or simply 65-90. The King Air evolved from the Queen Air when turbine engines were added and the “A90” was added to the designation. Eventually it became simply a BE-90 without the “65” and know as B90, C90, etc.
A 350 should be able to climb out after losing an engine unless the pilot rotated early or miscalculated his take-off weight or overloaded the plane, so sad for all involved.
I just saw a review of the Texas King Air on AOPA Live on YouTube. It seems like a fine aircraft-very modern and luxurious. I’m not sure how an accident like this could happen.
Corrections:
6 passengers
2 crew
2 in hanger
Be interesting to see the credentials of the crew. To Quote Sully: "There simply is no substitute for experience when flying aircraft. Many flight departments are staffing with very low time pilots with very limited flying skills. Modern GA aircraft are keeping the fatalities down with the magic automated systems. BUT, they cannot cover poor flying skills when the automated systems fail. KA 350 is a exceptionally great plane. But can be challenging with an engine loss.
I wonder if there’s a correlation or trend between many retiring senior pilots with high time being replaced with many low time pilots not paired with a senior one to gradually pick up valuable experience before being pic.
Queen Airs were powered by Lycoming piston engines
seems like they had left engine issues while still on the ground and it got yanked into the air prematurely for whatever reason