wally
Seems like it would operate just fine without Russian participation.
Seems like it would operate just fine without Russian participation.
Would need to build some new modules to replace at least Zarya and add some power. In addition they have been using Progress for reboosting, though it has been demonstrated using a Cygnus.
It could be done, but folks would need to get going pretty soon. My understanding is Rogozin said they would take their modules at the closing date. Don;t know how gentle that process would be.
My understanding is that NASA has had plans for a while for private stations to replace the ISS function, and they would need to accelerate those. If so, NASA would probably prefer an orbital inclination less than the 53 degrees the ISS is currently on, an awkward inclination that was specifically done because Soyuz would not be able to get to that orbit from Baikonur.
1 replyclarification, soyuz can only get to the 53 degree inclination from Baikanur. Its awkward for everyone else.
No big surprise. Ever since SpaceX has been sending replacement crew members and supplies to the ISS with its Dragon capsules, the millions of dollars the US and other countries paid Russia to ferry the same with its Soyuz launches has dwindled. Russia’s initial involvement with building the station was partially to support their collapsing space industry when the Soviet Union fell. Even at that, their modules were often behind schedule and fraught with problems. I had to laugh when Borisov said they would be pursuing building their own station. Fat chance in their current economic climate. Maybe they can suck up to the Chinese and get invited to their new station. That’s assuming it is in an orbit they can reach from Baikanur.
Yes, do it.