9 replies
June 2023

roganderson60

Nice. Bless the old T-38. Still looks as modern and fast as it did about 60 years ago. Best purchase the USAF ever made. Now the T 7A only has to wait another 2 or 3 years before entering service so someone can figure out how to build an ejection seat that one size fits all and can eject them safely. Previously, the pilot had to fit the seat. That can no longer be mandated. …I guess…

1 reply
June 2023

Will_Alibrandi

In a different era, the P-51 went from contract to prototype in 102 days. It flew the following month. Apples and oranges for sure, but I was struck by the delta in development time. I hope the T-7A doesn’t encounter the delays so typical of military devel programs nowadays.

2 replies
June 2023

William_Kelly

Bring back the T-33. Ok, that won’t happen, but I get nostalgic.

June 2023

Roger_Mullins

Looks like a “Weird” F-18 Hornet.

June 2023

davidbunin

Our US Air Force: training pilots tomorrow for a pilotless future.

June 2023

rammstark

Might as well have shown a drone!

June 2023 ▶ Will_Alibrandi

NewUserName

They didn’t have all the computer aids either. Exactly how stupid are we compared with those earlier generations? I use to think it was just getting old that made you think kids were stupid, but I’m now seeing it’s been a long time trend, lol.

July 2023 ▶ Will_Alibrandi

jlsmith322

The P-51 prototype flew quickly… as did the prototype for the T-7 which flew years ago. But the P-51 was a dog until the Merlin engine and eventually the P-51D is the one we remember. The T-7 is going through its own teething issues. Turns out development hasn’t really changed that much single World War II.

July 2023 ▶ roganderson60

jlsmith322

Offering bright eyed student pilots the chance to fly that SAME jet from the 1950s isn’t quite the same draw as it was 60 years ago. The Air Force has to expand the pool the potential pilots because the deal isn’t attracting enough applicants anymore.