8 replies
February 2021

Arthur_Foyt

So, it’s a BD-10.

1 reply
February 2021

maule

My word that’s cool. I Hope many future pilots learn a lot flying it. I certainly would!

February 2021

system

$9.2 billion seems like a lot at first, but the T-7A is over double the performance of the Super Tucano for about the same price.

February 2021 ▶ Arthur_Foyt

system

HaHaHa! Yes and no. This one leverages full-size determinant assembly. The other one had builder assist in case you didn’t have enough tools in the garage.

February 2021

dvtc140

OK, who had “Leverages full-size determinant assembly” in Buzzword Bingo? Any winners? Always exciting when the Management Book of the Month Club comes out with a new volume for all the VPs.

1 reply
February 2021

Richard_G

This looks alot like the Bede kit jet.

February 2021

system

As with all USAF pilots of my era, I have my 110 +/- hours in the T-38. Simple, effective, go-fast trainer, fun-to-fly. I am sure that the future crowd will say the same about the T-7. Based on my experience, I would have preferred two motors but that is my personal preference. After all, the Navy hasn’t exactly littered the country with carcasses of the one motor T-45.
One feature that I hope this aircraft does NOT HAVE is too much “stall” protection. In the T-38, the student had it drummed in that the “numbers” had to be honored or really bad things will happen… and in more than one occasion, they did. Example: in the T-38 you left the rudder pedals alone unless you were taxiing or purposely doing a rudder roll at altitude. In one instance, I saw a -38 upside down high in the final turn… thanks to application of the rudder. Fortunately, the very senior IP saw this coming, reacted fast enough and recovered the aircraft. The student would have been dead had that IP not been there. My IP and all of our IP’s beat that into us.
The reason that I stress my preference to not have too much automation for “safety” reasons is that pilots need to experience and learn what the aircraft and physics are telling them, to a given level, without learning to blindly rely on automation to save them. Automation can and will fail, period. One just never knows when or to what extent it will fail. Think I am wrong here? Just look up accidents in automated cars like the Tesla, etc. I am NOT knocking those cars or the technology. I am saying that automation should never be the first line of defense. After all, planes in the Airbus fleet are highly automated because engineers know so much more than those silly pilots… yet there are Airbus parts scattered over parts of the landscape. There is lots of stuff that pilots don’t learn about Airbus family aircraft because “they don’t need to know that”. Hmmm…

March 2021 ▶ dvtc140

Keith_Sketchley

You might enjoy the book ‘Fad Surfing in the Boardroom’. :wink: