Continue Discussion - visit the forum 10 replies
March 26

pilotmww

About time the FAA upheld its conditions for funding!

2 replies
March 26 ▶ pilotmww

Raf

I agree. About time the FAA upheld its conditions for funding!

March 26 ▶ pilotmww

gmbfly98

The question is, will Santa Clara actually face any consequences if they don’t follow this ruling?

1 reply
March 27 ▶ gmbfly98

Ehsif727

Santa Clara will probably just close the airport down. Thank you, AOPA.

1 reply
March 27

JFG

Some Federal judge will step in and block this. You watch.

March 27 ▶ Ehsif727

kor745

They can’t for the same reason the FAA ruled on the 100LL ban.

March 27

kent.misegades

Godd news that should have started with “Thanks to the new Trump administration…” It is hard to feel much sympathy for this airport however. Over a decade ago, I helped a group of pilots there trying to establish Mogas sales. We estimated that well over 70% of all piston aircraft based there would operate legally, safely, and for less money on Mogas. We identified a low-cost fuel system that would have paid for itself in a short time. The airport authority was anything but helpful however. Add to this the difficulty getting a supply of ethanol-free fuel anywhere in California, a very backwards state. We did find a supplier just across the state line, but ultimately the airport itself opposed this, probably under pressure from Avgas suppliers who fear competition. See pure-gas.org for a map of mogas suppliers - California is an E0 Desert thanks to its bonehead energy policies.

1 reply
March 27

Samuel_Drake

There is no safe use of 100LL. It may not be that much of a hazard to the general public but it is certainly a hazard to anyone fueling a plane and it is also a hazard to safely flying a plane as it causes lead fouling of the ignition and the oil.

March 27

a1groves

My understanding that the “consequences” are the inability to get any new airport grants. Since Santa Clara County has already not taken a new grant since 2012?? and have said that they will not take any more grants, there is no “consequence”.

11h ▶ kent.misegades

Aviatrexx

Wow! That was fast!

Not the “Godd news”, but the speed with which “the new Trump Administration” stepped in, waved a magic wand, and POOF! all the years of hard-slogging work by so many pilot groups and lawyers disappears in a sulfurous cloud of Trump-attribution.

It’s amazing to think that the very same crowd that can’t be bothered to read the Signal Users’ Guide, could muster the brain-power to take credit for a federal judge’s ruling.that was in the works for over two years before they were issued their badges. Oh wait, the new Trump administration isn’t taking the credit. You are doing it on their behalf.

What’s amazing is that there was anyone left in the FAA to send out a press release, after your Cheeto-in-Chief took a Musk-Ax to that agency.