johnbpatson
Ho-hum, wasn’t the first Lockheed contract the one which led to the disgrace of the Dutch consort?
These things come back to haunt you…
Ho-hum, wasn’t the first Lockheed contract the one which led to the disgrace of the Dutch consort?
These things come back to haunt you…
Sounds like a good win for Embraer.
Interesting that customer sees the 390 as more reliable than the 130J.
Certainly Hercs left much to be desired in the 1970s, Pacific Western made many mods especially for High Arctic operations. (Never mind the blather about the Herc being proven in cold climates.) Subsequently more mods were made by heavy maintenance contractors for Allied military operations.
There was a serious problem in the 1970s of Lockheed-Georgia depending on military funding to develop reliability improvements but US military had warehouses full of spares that I wondered how they would get to the front line to rescue an airplane. Failure to ‘integrate’ in thinking.
… meh … for tactical and short field operations, I would have chosen 4 fans turning, rather than 2 jets.
But what do I know …
I will happily ride a large twin across oceans based on the zillions of hours of proof that the ETOPS rule change was reasonable. And I know that lower hourly costs will mean more things get done. But there is that gut preference for 4 engines in harsh or contested environments. Maybe OEI it will fly like a 757. And some US kit is kinda excessive I guess. Maybe that skews my expectations.