system
The NATO code for fighters are along the lines of flogger or fulcrum.
The NATO code for bombers are along the lines of bear or badger.
The NATO code for these smaller circular airborne devices will be something like skeet or trap.
The NATO code for fighters are along the lines of flogger or fulcrum.
The NATO code for bombers are along the lines of bear or badger.
The NATO code for these smaller circular airborne devices will be something like skeet or trap.
I find it dizzying how fast the availability of accurate (& inexpensive) solid-state AHRS components is making the exotic commonplace in vehicle control. Next big step needed is breakthroughs in the even more SciFi-ish “thought control” user interface initiatives. I suspect that too is closer than we think.
I thought the same thing, Mark. Pull! 
It made me laugh when they started fantasising on French radio and TV about infantry being issued with these.
What is not clear in the video is that the five model aircraft turbines used on the board, collectively make a noise like a 707 used to before airports were told to keep quiet or else…
He usually flys for 5 minutes and for that uses 20 litres of kerosene, so for 10 minutes, it will be 40 litres of kerosene – “Now listen here, I need a squad of volunteers to go into battle with a very noisy jet strapped to your feet and an extra 40 litres of kerosene (about 35kg I think) strapped to your person along with your normal battle kit. You, you, you, and you, have volunteered! Dismiss.”